Loy,
In "Money,Sex,War,Karma" you included a chapter entitledTrapped In Time. After reading it, and taking quite an extensive period to digest it, the cogs started turning. You idealize that to fear time is useless, as we are time, and therefore cannot have time. How we can be a part of something that is endless unless we are endless ourselves? With that being said, if there is no 'self', what is the point of differentiating between time, no time, self, no self, nothing, or everything? Is there a point, or are you trying to tell us all that all the time that we put into wondering is only going to lead us to find one of those other nothings? Are we trying to find that nothing so we lose any reason to fear anything? If nothing is nothing to fear, than what should we be afraid of? So many questions. My last question for you, Dr. Loy, is this. What is the difference between us being a part of time, and time being a part of us?
Thanks,
Alex Underhill
No comments:
Post a Comment